Today's Politicos vs The Words and Deeds of The Founders
Make a blogger happy, come back. Sign up for email post alerts!
Watergate With 300 Dead People
Bill Whittle is on fire in this one.
Sign Up For Post Alerts!
The posts are coming!Currently Reading
-
The Complete Aubrey/Maturin Novels (re-reading) by Patrick O’Brian -
The Philosopher in the City by Hadley Arkes
9 comments
People are leaving Hillary Clinton out of this. Why? She’s part of this administration which is to say she has the same ideology! She favors a UN resolution for gun control that would usurp our second amendment rights! The body count from this gun-running scheme was meant to trigger political outcry and public outrage, magnified by the liberal media. This would have advanced the administrations’ agenda, not only in both houses of congress, but at the UN as well. These little tinhorn dictators were out to get a two for one. When the Clinton administration instituted the assault weapons ban you can bet ” the smartest woman in the world” was fully in support of it. She’s salivating like Pavlov’s dog to get this ban passed at the UN. Just as she and other elitists/democrats/liberals/communists/socialists/statists/–looters all– want to destroy our constitutional rights; not just the second amendment. Sleep well, all.
[Reply]
Martin Reply:
June 24th, 2012 at 4:32 pm
There are so many culpable people, it is hard to list them all. Hillary is certainly no saint.
[Reply]
This video does an excellent job of describing Fast & Furious. One thing it omits is that gun shops alerted DOJ of suspicious buys and were told to let them go. They had it well in hand. Then when F&F first got exposed, DOJ blamed these same cooperative gun stores. When this was easily proved false, they switched tactics.
[Reply]
Martin Reply:
June 24th, 2012 at 4:33 pm
They are hardly even bothering to cover most things up anymore. They are losing the ability to be sophisticated because they assume no one is watching.
[Reply]
Through Fast and Furious the government supplied weapons to Mexican drug cartels. Wouldn’t that make these cartels GSEs (government sponsored enterprises)?
[Reply]
Martin Reply:
June 24th, 2012 at 4:33 pm
Maybe you’re on to something …
[Reply]
Michael E. Newton Reply:
June 24th, 2012 at 6:18 pm
Uh oh, time for a federally-sponsored bailout.
[Reply]
Curtice Mang Reply:
June 24th, 2012 at 7:01 pm
Wonder how many Mexican drug cartels are “too big to fail?”
[Reply]
Remember, it’s not a scandal unless the objective press says so. And the objective press is always right.
[Reply]
Leave a Comment